The Casual Vacancy

[The Casual Vacancy]
Year: 
2012
Type: 
Moral assessment: 
Type: Literature
Nothing inappropriate.
Some morally inappropriate content.
Contains significant sections contrary to faith or morals.
Contains some lurid passages, or presents a general ideological framework that could confuse those without much Christian formation.
Contains several lurid passages, or presents an ideological framework that is contrary or foreign to Christian values.
Explicitly contradicts Catholic faith or morals, or is directed against the Church and its institutions.
Literary quality: 
Recommendable: 
Transmits values: 
Sexual content: 
Violent content: 
Vulgar or obscene language: 
Ideas that contradict Church teaching: 
The rating of the different categories comes from the opinion of Delibris' collaborators

It is difficult to say what makes the greatest impression of J.K. Rowling’s "The Casual Vacancy". Perhaps it is a teenage boy’s reference to his father with labels which, amidst the repulsive squall of profanity that concludes the second chapter, stand out only because they are italicized. The cloud of bad or obscene language is meanwhile becoming ever thicker, on occasion becoming so abrasive and predictable that one flinches as one flips, each page promising a new eyeful of dirt. Keep going, and readers will encounter everything from wife and child-beating through drug addiction and self-mutilation to suicide and rape (two rapes, actually – one, graphically described, another inflicted on a 3-year-old boy. Even Rowling demurs at describing this one). Pick a page: locating such material in “The Casual Vacancy” is as simple as spinning a roulette wheel. About the only thing missing is cannibalism. Vices are tragic manifestations of victimhood, men – particularly fathers – are pathetic, negligent, and/or abusive. For those who would object that a well-written novel about misery and depravity will indeed come across as miserable and depraved, “The Casual Vacancy” isn’t well written, either.

H.J.S. (2012)